Archive for the 'advertising/marketing' Category

cute will never be the same

Wednesday, May 2nd, 2007

I just came across the new ad campaign for the summer koala exhibit at the Kansas City Zoo (through the mediapost out to launch newsletter). The tag line is “cute will never be the same” and I think it has been well executed. The print ads are great:

The Duck is my favorite

otlDuck
But these are cute too!
otlPuppy

otlKitten

The video ad isn’t as good, but it sticks to the theme. I can’t embed it, but you can watch it here. The campaign was created and executed by Bernstein-Rein out of Kansas City.

On a side note… the campaign is sponsored by Hy-Vee… I LOVE Hy-Vee! I spent a lot of valuable time in the Macomb, IL Hy-Vee back in my college days.

blogging banks

Sunday, April 29th, 2007

Last Thursday, I attended a brainstorming meeting at Wainwright bank. Bob Glassman, co-founder of the bank, is exploring the idea of increasing the banks web presence and sent out an open invitation to progressive bloggers in the Boston area to participate in the discussion.

Before attending this meeting, I knew very little about Wainwright bank and its socially and politically progressive policies and activities. So, from a personal standpoint this was a very educational meeting for me. I told Bob that I currently do all of my banking at Bank of America simply because they were the most recognizable name and they haven’t yet pissed me off. Apparently, inertia is a big problem for banks when trying to build membership. After learning more about the banks commitment to the community, I’m a bit more motivated to consider switching banks.

In the meantime, they’ve given me quite a bit to think about as far as business blogging goes. The meeting was quite successful and productive in part because of Wainwrights openness in considering all suggestions as well as the high caliber of participants in the conversation. The other people at the meeting were:

Most of these bloggers are outwardly progressive in their blogging content and were at the meeting to hear about Wainwright’s plan for extending their progressive stance to the internet. I think I was a unique participant in the fact that I don’t usually write about politics on my blog and I was most interested in talking about Wainwright’s strategy for communicating online. All in all, I think this made for a perfect mix in perspectives and opinions. No matter how Wainwright ultimately decides to participate in the blogosphere, I think they are already on the right track simply by considering it, studying it and getting to know the bloggers who most closely represent their potential audience. Wainwright had many concerns about the whole idea and asked a lot of great questions including:

  • How will this balance with current regulation?
  • What are the ethical contrainsts?
  • What needs to be done to build trust and achieve transparency?
  • How do we build and audience and develop an online personality?
  • Will this be one way or two way communication?
  • Is a Wainwright blog the best option?
  • If so, what should be the post topics?

Bob made one comment that really stuck with me. He was concerned that the blog would look too much like an advertisement and that by pushing themselves out there, they would only turn off potential customers. Whatever Wainwright did, Bob wanted it to be genuine. He said, “What we do and who we are is very unique and fragile. The more you market it, the more you de-value the brand.” This can be very true in many circumstances, but what I tried to help Bob understand is that a blog does not have to be a vehicle for driving Wainwrights message. Instead, it can be a forum for Wainwright to connect with its audience and, most importantly, for the public to get to know Wainwright. The banks personality will shine through very subtly in the topics it chooses to write about.

I got the impression that the meeting served as a great starting point for Wainwright to “wrap its head” around the idea of blogging and online communication and how they might fit into the mix. I hope that, as they become more comfortable with the idea, we will get more opportunities to discuss strategy and tactics.

The following is what I would recommend for Wainwright:

Start participating immediately. This can mean a variety of different things such as building a list of blogs with relevant content, maybe advertise on some of thosed blogs, make online friends through comments or guest blogging. Shai made a great point in his post about the meeting

“Also, I should mention that there’s been some hesitation from other bloggers in attending the meeting, because they felt that they were just helping Wainwright figure out their marketing strategy for free, and/or are being asked to provide free advertising. I had some worries about that before the meeting, but they are pretty well allayed by now. As liberals, we are all very suspicious of being manipulated by corporations, and corporations with a progressive image are sometimes the worst offenders. That skepticism is healthy, but it should not be so strong as to wall us off from bona fide allies. If we are going to build a lasting movement for real progressive change, then we are going to have to build (or work with) institutions to keep the momentum going. Just as the union movement in the 1930’s needed newspapers, union halls, solidarity committees, and all sorts of other supporting institutions, so will we need think tanks, media outlets, and yes, banks, to aggregate political and financial capital to support our causes. We should not hesitate to establish those institutions when we need to, but we certainly shouldn’t re-invent the wheel when we have a perfectly solid ally, as we do with Wainwright.”

Develop a Wainwright blog. This shouldn’t happen right away. As Wainwright starts participating online, it will become clear to them how they want to grow and increase that participation. The details will show themselves. I suspect a blog will still make sense and Wainwright will have to make decisions about format and content. I think it will be a hybrid of sorts.

The blog should have many contributors with one Chief blogger to keep things organized. Bob should post on a regular schedule and his VPs should post as news worthy topics arise. For example, somebody from the mortgage department could post about the sub-prime lending issue. They should also invite their non-profit customers to guest blog; this will be the best way for the bank to talk about their progressive outlook on issues. They should also leave commenting open to encourage a 2-way conversation. Sure, the conversation may not always be positive, but the bank will have an opportunity to really show its personality in the way in reacts to these comments. This is where I believe the next blogging brainstorming meeting will come into play. Hopefully, Wainwright will be able to learn from the more seasoned Boston bloggers and will be able to avoid many of the common blogging mistakes.

From my perspective, it is becoming increasingly clear that all businesses will need to begin thinking about their web presence; a blog may not make sense for all of them, but participation online will be inevitable. I’m happy to see that Wainwright is setting itself up to be a pioneer in the process.

experience

Monday, April 23rd, 2007

I’ll admit that I am known in some circles as “Boston’s foremost expert in internet and word-of-mouth marketing.” I try to be modest, but my doting fans can make it very difficult. I think this little comic says it all ;)
word of mouth

viral buzz

Tuesday, March 13th, 2007

This morning, I was at a BIMA roundtable event spearheaded by Dave Balter, founder of BzzAgent. It was titled, “Bringing Word of Mouth into your Marketing Mix.” Most of the content of Dave’s presentation and the succeeding discussion was a nice review for me, but it also sparked a few thoughts that dug a little deeper.

Finding a balance between traditional marketing and the new forms of “grassroots” marketing can be difficult. But, before that can be accomplished, I think the industry must first find a balance between the many segments of this new avenue of communication.

(Maybe, even before that, we should decide on an umbrella name for grassroots, word of mouth, collaborative marketing, viral marketing, etc. I like customer,constituent or audience engagement)

Dave summed up his presentation into 5 key points of word of mouth marketing:

  1. Don’t use entertainment as a substitute for the brand
  2. Consumers will do what they want with your brand
  3. Buzz does not always equal word of mouth
  4. Don’t lie, cheat, steal or deceive
  5. The only for successful word of mouth marketing is a great product

Dave caught my attention right off the bat. He began by explaining that viral and word of mouth are not the same. He explained that viral marketing substitutes the brand for entertainment and, therefore, breaks the number one rule of word of mouth marketing.

He used the Paris Hilton commercial for Carl’s Jr. as an example:


It was extremely viral and it is easy to see why. I counted 333,702 views on YouTube from the first search page alone. I’m sure the clip was viewed just as many times on any number of websites, communities and blogs. But, as Dave pointed out, there was a problem: during the time this ad aired, sales dropped 3%. Why? The Carl’s Jr. Brand was compromised. They focused all of their energy on creating a viral campaign rather than a word of mouth campaign.

I’m not going to dispute Dave’s claim here. In fact, I’ll support him. The commercial, although eye catching, does not include any call to action. If their goal was increased brand exposure, they got it; but, this ad may be giving the brand a new identity. If they were aiming to build a stronger brand or increase sales, they failed.I have to ask, though: can’t word of mouth and viral marketing function successfully together? In fact, if executed successfully, wouldn’t they compliment each other? Wouldn’t one serve as an accelerator for the other, and visa versa? Shouldn’t the two be symbiotic?

If you compromise your brand in order to create a viral conversation, then chances are you won’t reach any goals tied to that brand. And, to many companies, the brand is everything. But, not all viral campaigns have to substitute brand for entertainment. A great viral campaign would find a way to make the brand entertaining in a way that the audience will be laughing with you… not at you. Once you’ve found a way to creatively develop the right balance between brand and entertainment, you will need word of mouth conversations before your campaign will ever go viral.

I’m not quite sure how to conclude this drivel. It reality, I may never reach a conclusion. I have a feeling that by the time we as an industry find the right balance, the medium du jour will have morphed into something even more exciting, confusing and frustrating.

are you feeling too gringo?

Thursday, February 22nd, 2007

I just saw this AdAge article about Mun2’s new identity ads; they’re a bit controversial, but really fun. And, as I’m not exactly part of the demographic, I can’t say for sure, but I’m guessing this speaks well to their market:

“[The campaign] plays with the idea of ‘Check your balance’ for our second-generation, bilingual demo of young people who live within two cultures,” said Alex Pels, general manager of Mun2 (pronounced “Moon-dos”). “How can you assimilate into [American] culture and retain the identity from your Latin roots? These are all images that reflect part of a certain reality of Latin culture in this country.”

I hope Mun2 intends to expand on the campaign… they could do a lot to build a following from this attitude/idea. For starters, someone needs to get these up on youtube! For now, you can view the ads here. Enjoy!

mun2_Fences
Now I feel like an hombre again ;)

I love zipcar!

Wednesday, February 14th, 2007

zipcar.png

sleep is for dead people

Monday, September 18th, 2006

Foldger’s is trying to reach out to the 20-something consumer. They’ve got me; my parents were strict foldger’s drinkers and I’ve been drinking it since I was about 10. But, to get the rest of this target market, they’ve launched a new micro-site to help us night-owls “tolerate mornings.”


From BizJournals:

The trick to success, however, is sell-through: Will the space move people to buy Folgers, a 150-year-old brand that generates more than $1 billion annually?

Procter won’t begin to measure that for a few months, Bello said. But even if the site does not sell Folgers, the effort — which cost a fraction of a traditional TV spot — should energize others at Procter to compete more creatively online. That alone would make the effort worth it, said Pete Blackshaw, chief marketing officer at the Cincinnati office of Nielsen BuzzMetrics.

“Procter needs to do a lot more experimentation,” he said. “They need to re-energize their Web marketing, and this appears to be a promising step.”

They’re definitely on the right track, but I’m not about to evangelize their brand just yet.

Cute Marketing Campaign:

Friday, September 1st, 2006

Cheer’s new laundry detergent, True Fit, has a pretty cute website and an interesting promotion campaign. I heard of it through a Daily Candy dedicated email. The product itself is intriguing; I’d try it if I wasn’t too much of a glamour queen to do my own laundry. This is a perfect spot to plug my laundry service; these guys have greatly improved the quality of my domestic life. I now enjoy complete freedom from laundry!

TrueFit Label

Zipcars in Toronto

Monday, August 28th, 2006

Update: The inverview went really well last week, but I didn’t make it into the actual article, which can be read here. It is actually very well written with a great sense of “humour.” Oh well… there’s always next time. Anyone else want to chat about Zipcar?
I’ve often thought that I am Zipcar’s biggest word of mouth marketer. I love their service and I will tell anybody and everybody about it! I talk about zipcar nonstop! I’ve even blogged about it.

Well, that blogpost has come in handy! A reporter for the Toronto Star has found me and wants to chat! How exciting :) and how lucky for zipcar! They should give me free stuff. I want a t-shirt!

TV advertising

Tuesday, August 8th, 2006

I am one of those rare people freaks that actually enjoys the ads just as much (and sometimes more) than the actualy programming on TV. Recently, this one really caught my eye.
The first is for the new State Farm Insurance “Now What” campaign. It is an attention-getter prompting viewers to visit the new website built for renter\’s insurance and auto insurance. I really wish I could find a clip of the commercials. They\’re classic! This campaign has a few \”viral\” qualities as well. I love the interactive website… I spent at least 10 minutes exploring the many scenarios and they didn\’t exactly sell me on renters insurance… but they got me thinking, which is a good start.

Also, while watching a Red Sox game at Tavern in the Square recently, I noticed the value of audio in TV advertising. The sound on the TV at the bar was muted, and some commercials were still 100% effective, while others were complete flops. This was never a topic of discussion in my advertising classes (which weren’t too advanced or sports related, so I may have just missed out), but I would think this should be a major consideration for ad developers and media buyers.

If I was developing or producing an ad, I would want to know when and where this was planned to air so I could build/design/produce accordingly. If I were purchasing time for the ad I would want to know what kind of ad it was so I could place it in the most appropriate time slot. Audio capabilities and background/environmental noise should definitly be considered when making these desisions, especially if you plan on tying your ad to any major sporting event, which is so often viewed in a loud and distracting drinking establishment. I was surprised at how much advertisers relied on audio for ads that were meant to air during a baseball broadcast.