Archive for the 'Boston' Category

wainwright update

Wednesday, May 9th, 2007

Total WhipperSnapr moment:

After the blogging brainstorming session with Wainwright bank, I sent Bob Glassman the co-chairman, an email thanking him for hosting the meeting and offering up some follow-up thoughts. To my luck and surprise, I was invited back for a one-on-one chat with Bob and the CEO and Sr. VP of Consumer Banking. Wow - talk about intimidating! I have to admit that I’m pretty proud of myself. I don’t know too many 24 year olds that can roll into a meeting with the executives of a bank and tell them exactly what I think. I held it together quite well.

Our conversation focused mainly on the many online options available to Wainwright and the steps they should take to prepare themselves. I think Wainwright has a great story and a great personality, it would translate well on a blog if done right. I cautioned them, though, that jumping in head first would be a big mistake. They are doing the right thing by exploring the idea, talking to bloggers about it and getting used to the thought of existing online. They need to take their time, but when they are ready, Wainwrights blog should be pretty good! I’m excited to see what they do and I hope I get to continue to play a role.

I’ll be sure to keep you posted on their progress. In other WhipperSnapr news…I will be starting a new job on May 22nd! It was all a bit sudden and unexpected, but it is really exciting stuff! Josh and I are off for a vacation in Wales next week and, when we return, I will tell you all about it ;)

blogging banks

Sunday, April 29th, 2007

Last Thursday, I attended a brainstorming meeting at Wainwright bank. Bob Glassman, co-founder of the bank, is exploring the idea of increasing the banks web presence and sent out an open invitation to progressive bloggers in the Boston area to participate in the discussion.

Before attending this meeting, I knew very little about Wainwright bank and its socially and politically progressive policies and activities. So, from a personal standpoint this was a very educational meeting for me. I told Bob that I currently do all of my banking at Bank of America simply because they were the most recognizable name and they haven’t yet pissed me off. Apparently, inertia is a big problem for banks when trying to build membership. After learning more about the banks commitment to the community, I’m a bit more motivated to consider switching banks.

In the meantime, they’ve given me quite a bit to think about as far as business blogging goes. The meeting was quite successful and productive in part because of Wainwrights openness in considering all suggestions as well as the high caliber of participants in the conversation. The other people at the meeting were:

Most of these bloggers are outwardly progressive in their blogging content and were at the meeting to hear about Wainwright’s plan for extending their progressive stance to the internet. I think I was a unique participant in the fact that I don’t usually write about politics on my blog and I was most interested in talking about Wainwright’s strategy for communicating online. All in all, I think this made for a perfect mix in perspectives and opinions. No matter how Wainwright ultimately decides to participate in the blogosphere, I think they are already on the right track simply by considering it, studying it and getting to know the bloggers who most closely represent their potential audience. Wainwright had many concerns about the whole idea and asked a lot of great questions including:

  • How will this balance with current regulation?
  • What are the ethical contrainsts?
  • What needs to be done to build trust and achieve transparency?
  • How do we build and audience and develop an online personality?
  • Will this be one way or two way communication?
  • Is a Wainwright blog the best option?
  • If so, what should be the post topics?

Bob made one comment that really stuck with me. He was concerned that the blog would look too much like an advertisement and that by pushing themselves out there, they would only turn off potential customers. Whatever Wainwright did, Bob wanted it to be genuine. He said, “What we do and who we are is very unique and fragile. The more you market it, the more you de-value the brand.” This can be very true in many circumstances, but what I tried to help Bob understand is that a blog does not have to be a vehicle for driving Wainwrights message. Instead, it can be a forum for Wainwright to connect with its audience and, most importantly, for the public to get to know Wainwright. The banks personality will shine through very subtly in the topics it chooses to write about.

I got the impression that the meeting served as a great starting point for Wainwright to “wrap its head” around the idea of blogging and online communication and how they might fit into the mix. I hope that, as they become more comfortable with the idea, we will get more opportunities to discuss strategy and tactics.

The following is what I would recommend for Wainwright:

Start participating immediately. This can mean a variety of different things such as building a list of blogs with relevant content, maybe advertise on some of thosed blogs, make online friends through comments or guest blogging. Shai made a great point in his post about the meeting

“Also, I should mention that there’s been some hesitation from other bloggers in attending the meeting, because they felt that they were just helping Wainwright figure out their marketing strategy for free, and/or are being asked to provide free advertising. I had some worries about that before the meeting, but they are pretty well allayed by now. As liberals, we are all very suspicious of being manipulated by corporations, and corporations with a progressive image are sometimes the worst offenders. That skepticism is healthy, but it should not be so strong as to wall us off from bona fide allies. If we are going to build a lasting movement for real progressive change, then we are going to have to build (or work with) institutions to keep the momentum going. Just as the union movement in the 1930’s needed newspapers, union halls, solidarity committees, and all sorts of other supporting institutions, so will we need think tanks, media outlets, and yes, banks, to aggregate political and financial capital to support our causes. We should not hesitate to establish those institutions when we need to, but we certainly shouldn’t re-invent the wheel when we have a perfectly solid ally, as we do with Wainwright.”

Develop a Wainwright blog. This shouldn’t happen right away. As Wainwright starts participating online, it will become clear to them how they want to grow and increase that participation. The details will show themselves. I suspect a blog will still make sense and Wainwright will have to make decisions about format and content. I think it will be a hybrid of sorts.

The blog should have many contributors with one Chief blogger to keep things organized. Bob should post on a regular schedule and his VPs should post as news worthy topics arise. For example, somebody from the mortgage department could post about the sub-prime lending issue. They should also invite their non-profit customers to guest blog; this will be the best way for the bank to talk about their progressive outlook on issues. They should also leave commenting open to encourage a 2-way conversation. Sure, the conversation may not always be positive, but the bank will have an opportunity to really show its personality in the way in reacts to these comments. This is where I believe the next blogging brainstorming meeting will come into play. Hopefully, Wainwright will be able to learn from the more seasoned Boston bloggers and will be able to avoid many of the common blogging mistakes.

From my perspective, it is becoming increasingly clear that all businesses will need to begin thinking about their web presence; a blog may not make sense for all of them, but participation online will be inevitable. I’m happy to see that Wainwright is setting itself up to be a pioneer in the process.

economics

Thursday, March 22nd, 2007

Last night, as Josh and I were on our way to a pig vs. pig tasting event at Garden of Eden, Josh asked how much our tickets were.

“Twenty-five dollars, each,” I replied. “And, that includes the wine!”

“Great!” he said. “So, if we drink enough wine tonight, we’ll actually profit!

Ok, Josh. But where and how will you spend your extra, yet already consumed, wine? And he claims to be the logistic and numbers half of our “couple” brain.

viral buzz

Tuesday, March 13th, 2007

This morning, I was at a BIMA roundtable event spearheaded by Dave Balter, founder of BzzAgent. It was titled, “Bringing Word of Mouth into your Marketing Mix.” Most of the content of Dave’s presentation and the succeeding discussion was a nice review for me, but it also sparked a few thoughts that dug a little deeper.

Finding a balance between traditional marketing and the new forms of “grassroots” marketing can be difficult. But, before that can be accomplished, I think the industry must first find a balance between the many segments of this new avenue of communication.

(Maybe, even before that, we should decide on an umbrella name for grassroots, word of mouth, collaborative marketing, viral marketing, etc. I like customer,constituent or audience engagement)

Dave summed up his presentation into 5 key points of word of mouth marketing:

  1. Don’t use entertainment as a substitute for the brand
  2. Consumers will do what they want with your brand
  3. Buzz does not always equal word of mouth
  4. Don’t lie, cheat, steal or deceive
  5. The only for successful word of mouth marketing is a great product

Dave caught my attention right off the bat. He began by explaining that viral and word of mouth are not the same. He explained that viral marketing substitutes the brand for entertainment and, therefore, breaks the number one rule of word of mouth marketing.

He used the Paris Hilton commercial for Carl’s Jr. as an example:


It was extremely viral and it is easy to see why. I counted 333,702 views on YouTube from the first search page alone. I’m sure the clip was viewed just as many times on any number of websites, communities and blogs. But, as Dave pointed out, there was a problem: during the time this ad aired, sales dropped 3%. Why? The Carl’s Jr. Brand was compromised. They focused all of their energy on creating a viral campaign rather than a word of mouth campaign.

I’m not going to dispute Dave’s claim here. In fact, I’ll support him. The commercial, although eye catching, does not include any call to action. If their goal was increased brand exposure, they got it; but, this ad may be giving the brand a new identity. If they were aiming to build a stronger brand or increase sales, they failed.I have to ask, though: can’t word of mouth and viral marketing function successfully together? In fact, if executed successfully, wouldn’t they compliment each other? Wouldn’t one serve as an accelerator for the other, and visa versa? Shouldn’t the two be symbiotic?

If you compromise your brand in order to create a viral conversation, then chances are you won’t reach any goals tied to that brand. And, to many companies, the brand is everything. But, not all viral campaigns have to substitute brand for entertainment. A great viral campaign would find a way to make the brand entertaining in a way that the audience will be laughing with you… not at you. Once you’ve found a way to creatively develop the right balance between brand and entertainment, you will need word of mouth conversations before your campaign will ever go viral.

I’m not quite sure how to conclude this drivel. It reality, I may never reach a conclusion. I have a feeling that by the time we as an industry find the right balance, the medium du jour will have morphed into something even more exciting, confusing and frustrating.

wine

Monday, March 5th, 2007

My love for wine began almost 4 years ago while I was visiting a friend in Tucson, AZ. We took a day trip to a few southern Arizona vineyards. Who knew Arizona had a wine region!?

My first love was very innocent … The 2003 Sonoita Vineyards Angel Wings, a crisp and citrus-flavored white made from mission grapes. While I was at Sonoita I also tasted the 1989 Pinot Noir, the oldest wine I’ve ever tasted.

My taste, curiosity and affection for wine quickly evolved from there. I learned that I prefer reds over whites and there’s more to red wine than a Yellow Tail Shiraz. I’ve never met a blend I didn’t like and my all-time favorite is the Mak Snowy River, a Cabernet-Shiraz blend… delicious!

Why am I telling the world this? Well, my involvement for wine has moved to a new level and I want the world to know! Now, I’m doing some freelance work for a new Boston-based magazine that’s all about wine! The Second Glass is everything the Wine Spectator is not. We’re fun-loving, free-spirited and tight-budgeted…Read this to get a nice picture of who we are and what we want to be.

So, as I’m embracing this new world of fun, I’m discovering many great things about the Boston wine scene. First of all, Bostonians like their wine! And, many of them are interested in cheap and convenient ways to try more, experiment and learn. If you are one of them, join in the conversation on Yelp.

I hope I have much more to say about this very, very soon!

I love zipcar!

Wednesday, February 14th, 2007

zipcar.png

adolfo vs chicken: the game

Monday, February 12th, 2007

Finally! It launches! Check out Pod’s latest game, Adolfo vs Chicken!

Adolfo vs. Chicken

back to school

Monday, February 5th, 2007

Last Tuesday, my boss, Steve Curran, and I visited Professor Walter Carl’s word of mouth, buzz and viral marketing class at Northeastern University. You can read Walter’s run down of the day here.

First, I have to say the fact that Northeastern University even offers this class is very encouraging. I was always very discouraged at BU as they were not as open to studying new forms of communication. Not only am I really happy to see a well-respected academic community give deserved attention to this area of communication, but I was so happy to find that the students in the class took the subject very seriously. They were all engaged in the conversation and asked some well-thought, in-depth and critical questions. Both Steve and I were impressed with the quality of students in the class and would be happy to consider any of them for an internship position at Pod Design. (send me your resumes!)

I was equally impressed with Dr. Carl. I had been following his blogs for about 6 months, but had never had the honor of meeting him in person. We were able to grab lunch after class and discuss everything from research to metrics to business models. Very educational. I find that some days it is far too easy to slip into a mirrored box at work, hanging out with great academics always helps to keep perspective. They remind me to think outside of my current spot and start asking some critical questions.

Preparing for this visit was also very healthy for me from a work perspective; It forced me to boil down what I do into a quick, 10 minute, synopsis. I was able to outline my priorities, justify my work and develop insight in the areas that are very important to my work but can often feel tedious or dull from day-to-day. It was also a great reminder of why I was motivated to take this job in the first place.

So, thank you to Dr. Carl and his class for a great experience!

I feel like writing

Tuesday, January 23rd, 2007

I’ve noticed a trend in my blogging habits. My blogging moods can be categorized as such:

  • I can’t think of anything to write about so, therefore, I don’t write.
  • I can think of a million things to write about but don’t know where to start. Therefore, I don’t write.
  • I feel like writing but about nothing in particular/interesting, so, therefore, I don’t write.
  • My job (sort of) depends on it; therefore I write.
  • I have a post floating around in my head for over two weeks. And, therefore, I write simply to get it out of my head.

I have spent the past three days reading blogs from in/around the Boston area for work purposes. Boston is rich with interesting, funny and intelligent bloggers! This is the best inspiration for a blogger with some writers block and/or laziness!

Some of my new discoveries include (in no particular order):

There are so many more, but those were my favorites so far. Now my problem will be finding time to read my new finds. I used bloglines, but I can’t seem to make daily bloglines visits a habit :(

Ticketing on the T

Thursday, January 18th, 2007

So, this morning, I read in the Metro that the T police and T employees have been given authorization to issue tickets to fare jumpers. If they catch you “jumping the gate” they can issue you a ticket with a $15 fine. Whats worse, though, is that at any time during your trip a T official could ask you for proof of fare purchase! WTF?!?!?!

In my case, I buy a montly Link pass. When I do this I do get a receipt, but do they expect me to carry that receipt around with me and my charlie card for the whole month?!? What if someone purchased a one way ticket and chose not to get a receipt. When most people use up their Charlie Tickets they throw them away (or throw them on the floor). How do these T officials expect us law-abiding, fare paying riders to distinguish ourselves from the 5% of riders that skip paying for their rides?

I understand the T is strapped for cash and their scraping the bottom of the barrel in an attempt to start balancing their budget, but is this tactic really cost effective? The metro article also mentioned that T officials were concerned that their employees would now face dangerous and confrontational situations on a daily basis; so, they will all need a little training on what to do = $$$. Also, theoretically, this is going to take time from whatever it is these employees are already doing. I assume they are working hard crunching numbers and balancing budgets when they are sitting in their little booths. And when their getting in peoples way at the fare machines? Why, that’s top notch customer service in action! Why would we want to distract them from such important responsibilities?
But, maybe I’m wrong about these hard working T employees, I can’t really ignore all of the countless blog posts and newspaper articles about how T employees aren’t the ultra-motivated, ambitious, go-getter types. So, where is the motivation for a bunch of T employees to start accosting strangers and asking to see receipts?

Maybe even more importantly, where’s the motivation for riders to pay the fines? The system will be like parking tickets; when you rack up a nice little tab at the RMV, they revoke your license until you pay. First of all, why should the tax dollars earmarked for the RMV now also go toward processing paperwork for the MBTA?

Also, Umm… I’m riding the T; why do I need my license? I don’t even have a MA license and, chances are, most people my age in Boston don’t. I don’t know the official stats on the number of daily T riders that are also car owners/drivers, but tying punishment to one’s license doesn’t seem to make a whole lot of sense to me. Except for the fact that there’s really no other way to keep track of the delinquents and their fines and tickets. Really, if they wanted to motivate me to pay they should threaten to put a hold on my zipcar membership! That would kill me in one cruel, swift motion.

And What are you going to do do the under 16 crowd? Ask to see their hall pass? Issue a detention? Confiscate their school ID? Call their mommies?

The idea doesn’t see to be very well thought out if you ask me, but then again neither does the entire T system or the new Charlie system.